For class counsel

A cy pres plan that strengthens the settlement instead of inviting objections.

When residual funds cannot reach class members, the cy pres plan becomes part of the record. We build it around the nexus to your case, keep counsel out of recipient selection, and document every step for the court.

Where we help

From the settlement agreement to the final report.

We can join at any stage. Earlier involvement leaves less to correct later.

  1. Settlement agreement

    Cy pres provisions that anticipate residual funds, with a purpose and criteria tied to the class and the claims, so the court approves them with the settlement.

    Snyder (2015), pp. 9, 13

  2. Notice and fairness hearing

    A distribution plan described in the notice, with a sufficient nexus to the litigation and a way to hold recipients accountable for the funds.

    Snyder (2015), pp. 9–10

  3. Selecting recipients

    Comprehensive outreach and extensive networking to surface the strongest applicants, then due diligence and an Administrator's Report and Recommendations. You keep the decisions, subject to court approval.

    Snyder (2015), p. 10

  4. Approval of recipients

    Documentation of the grant-making process to support your motion for approval of the recipients.

    Snyder (2015), p. 10

  5. After approval

    Grant agreements, payments tied to benchmarks, grantee monitoring, and annual and final reports, so the case can close cleanly.

    Snyder (2015), p. 11

Why it matters

The objections courts hear, and how the process answers them.

“The recipients are unrelated to the case.”

The Ninth Circuit rejected a distribution to "geographically isolated and substantively unrelated charities" in Nachshin v. AOL. Criteria built on the claims and the class, and a documented nexus for each recipient, answer it.

Snyder (2015), pp. 3–4

“The recipients were chosen for the parties.”

Objectors in the Google Buzz settlement argued that proposed recipients already received support from the defendant. An open, competitive process run by a neutral administrator answers it.

Snyder (2015), pp. 5–6

“Counsel steered the money.”

When every applicant contact goes to the administrator, colleagues and favored organizations cannot lobby counsel, and counsel never has to object to an applicant a co-counsel favors.

Snyder (2015), p. 14

[E]ach of the identified organizations has a nexus to the underlying lawsuit … the court approves the six cy pres recipients selected by the State and the Cy Pres Administrator.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, in California v. eBay, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-05874-EJD (Sept. 3, 2015), approving recipients selected through a grants program administered by Harry M. Snyder.

Independence

Arm's length from the parties.

We contract with plaintiff's counsel and Attorneys General offices to administer residual funds while keeping an arm's-length distance from the parties to the litigation. That distance, and our experience, protect the fairness of the recipient selection and avoid any appearance of impropriety.

We do not take positions on the merits, and we do not promise funds to anyone before the competitive process is complete.

Expecting residual funds?

Tell us where the case stands, the size of the fund and what the agreement says about unclaimed money. We respond within one business day.